GM & Ford: Are Credit Derivatives Markets Really Efficient? April 20, 2006
GM & Ford: Are Credit Derivatives Markets Really Efficient?
In the market for credit derivative swaps,
General Motors (NYSE:GM) is currently trading around 2,000 bp or 20% for five
year protection against a credit default, while Ford (NYSE:F) is trading around
half that level or a 10% probability of default or "P(D)".� We tend to be a
little more sanguine about the prospects for the latter, but it is clear, to us
at least, that rising gasoline prices are a more important factor that
the�prospect of a UAW strike when assessing�the P(D) for both GM and
At the NY Auto Show, GM CFO Fritz Henderson told the FT that "the
first rule as CFO [of GM] is do not run out of money."
Henderson went on to say that "if we were where we are but delivering 50 percent more Cobalts [cheap Chevrolet saloons] and 50% fewer sport utes I wouldn't be so calm."
If expectations regarding
higher�gasoline prices in the US this summer�and resulting retail auto sales trends
for�2006 are right, then GM may be headed precisely for the situation Henderson
describes, forcing�both GM and
F�into bankruptcy due to falling sales. Stable revenues are a necessary condition for GM
and F to avoid default, thus the question: Why is GM trading at only
a 20% implied P(D) in the CDS markets?�
Kevin Tynan at Argus Research tells the IRA that 2006 is "much scarier than 2005" for GM. "The Big 3 had to deal with $3 per gallon gasoline for three months in 2005. In 2006, we could see gas prices go over $4 and stay there. In the event, this implies a collapse in GM sales."
Tynan notes that GM truck sales were down 7% in Q1 2006 vs the year earlier,
this even with the introduction of the new�products.� In March, sales at GM and
Ford were down 14% and 4.6%. Toyota's sales were up 6.9% while DaimlerChrysler's increased 2.9%. Together, the Big 3's market share was 56.5%, down from 59.4% last year.
coincidence,�investor Wilbur Ross, who has been gobbling up failed auto
parts companies like Homer Simpson eating discount lunch meat,�says that the
Big 3 face the risk this year of lower sales, market share losses, and more
consumer demand for smaller cars. If all three occur, Mr. Ross says that the
effect would be "a business environment as hostile as Hurricane Katrina."�
As in the case of the pricing
in the CDS markets for credit default protection on GM, observing Mr. Ross
investing in the North American auto parts sector makes us wonder
whether�even sophisticated market participants fully appreciate how close
both�GM and F are to�the precipice.� If GM and�F survive to
the end of the decade, both companies must move a substantial portion of their
manufacturing and parts sourcing�offshore, most likely to Asia.�
So,�Mr. Ross, tell us again why you are so keen on
buying US-based auto parts companies?
Bottom line: If gasoline prices move into the $4 range in the US this summer, then the
P(D) of GM is likely to be a lot higher than 20% by Labor
Day.� And F will not be far behind.� So much for efficient market
The Institutional Risk Analyst is published by Lord, Whalen LLC (LW) and may not be reproduced, disseminated, or distributed, in part or in whole, by any means, outside of the recipient's organization without express written authorization from LW. It is a violation of federal copyright law to reproduce all or part of this publication or its contents by any means. This material does not constitute a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities or investments. The opinions expressed herein are based on publicly available information and are considered reliable. However, LW makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY SORT with respect to this report. Any person using this material does so solely at their own risk and LW and/or its employees shall be under no liability whatsoever in any respect thereof.
A Professional Services Organization
Copyright 2016 - Lord, Whalen LLC - All Rights Reserved