Among the more interesting comments we heard about last
week's IRA on the February market meltdown, "A Normal Correction: February 27 Market Break," concerns the true origins of the market sell-off in China. According an old China hand, the sharp drop in the value of China's financial markets was the side effect of a political struggle, not a financial event.
According
to this well-placed observer, whose firm provides risk management services throughout the region, the rising powers around the Chinese financial markets sent a message to the political cadres in Beijing. The message behind this not-so-subtle muscle flexing: we have the power to affect the stability of global markets and, indirectly, that of China's political future.
As heirs to the Confucian ethic which puts those
who decide matters of state at the top of the social ladder, and those
who engage in commerce with foreigners at the bottom, China's communist
leaders fear and distrust the power and motivations of the country's rising
class of economic princes.
The close association with foreign interests
of China's financial and business leaders makes their
loyalties subject to question. Chinese Communist Party cadres gladly accept
gratuities offered by business leaders and their foreign partners, but all the
while they ponder the political equation; they weigh the time when an
appeal to the populist dragon which lurks not far beneath the surface in China's
rapidly growing urban slums might be useful.
Rarely a day goes by now when some
financial observer does not question the gravity-defying climb of the Chinese
equity markets, a retail-fueled speculative boom the like of which has
not been seen in the supposedly developed world in 80 years. Whereas in
past times peasants
revolted at rumors of foreign missionaries eating children, perhaps the next cycle will include Chinese
financiers (perhaps joined by their foreign investment bankers) being lynched by an angry mob in retribution
for market losses. Crucifixion, after all, was the punishment of choice for speculators in ancient China.
An appeal to the populist animal
spirits is especially effective just following a financial bust, as Americans
learned in the early 1930s and US corporations learned with the passage
of Sarbanes-Oxley following the dot-com hiccup. The likely witch hunt
in the US following a more general financial market collapse might not rival the
thrills and excitement of, say, rioting in Shanghai, but one cannot help
but wonder at the social reaction, both in the US and China, when the global
financial markets inevitably correct.
To be more specific, a long-time reader tells The IRA that references to the
Pecora Commission, the special panel established by the Senate Banking
and Currency Committee in March of 1932 to investigate the causes of
the Wall Street Crash of 1929, may be appropriate in both societies. In
the four years of its operation, the Pecora Commission interrogated hundreds of
financial moguls and ultimately led to the creation of the SEC and modern-day
market regulation.
Whether or not the February 27 market break was the result of a political contest between
China's communist rulers and the rapidly growing power of that county's commercial
class, both the US and China face a serious social shock should the worst
fears regarding speculative excesses in the financial markets be realized. Measured in terms
of spreads and earnings multiples, the magnitude of the risks being
taken have never been higher and the rewards offered for taking those risks
never lower.
In the US, a sustained
financial market sell off might well tilt the balance of political fortune back
squarely in the hands
of the left for the first time in over a decade, but the
repercussions in China of a real Shanghai meltdown could be far more profound. Most observers assume that
China cannot reverse its opening process, but such assumptions ignore that country's violent and
changeable political history. Should China's political leaders decide one day to play the populist card and
attack the "opportunism" of China's business elite, the mass of
China's poor will be behind them and then, as they say, all
bets are off.
The Institutional Risk Analyst is published by Lord, Whalen LLC (LW) and may not be reproduced, disseminated, or distributed, in part or in whole, by any means, outside of the recipient's organization without express written authorization from LW. It is a violation of federal copyright law to reproduce all or part of this publication or its contents by any means. This material does not constitute a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities or investments. The opinions expressed herein are based on publicly available information and are considered reliable. However, LW makes NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY SORT with respect to this report. Any person using this material does so solely at their own risk and LW and/or its employees shall be under no liability whatsoever in any respect thereof.
A Professional Services Organization
Copyright 2016 - Lord, Whalen LLC - All Rights Reserved